Happy 78th Birthday, Social Security!

August 14, 2013 at 9:02 am

Social Security marks its 78th birthday today.  This highly successful program pays benefits to 57 million Americans.  It’s the single most important source of income for its elderly beneficiaries, contributing on average two-thirds of income for recipients over age 65.  For more than one-third of them, Social Security constitutes 90 percent or more of income (see graph).

Reliance on Social Security is especially high among the oldest— those who can no longer work and may have outlived their savings — and elderly blacks and Hispanics.  Without Social Security, nearly half of elderly Americans would live below the official poverty level; instead, fewer than 10 percent do.

But Social Security isn’t just for the elderly.  It protects workers who suffer a severe medical impairment, and children whose breadwinner dies, retires, or becomes disabled.  We estimate that in 2011 — the latest year for which we have data — it lifted more than 21 million Americans of all ages above the official poverty line (see table).

Social Security benefits are modest.  The average retired worker or elderly widow collects less than $1,300 a month, and disabled workers even less.  Nobody gets rich from Social Security:  only 9 percent of retired workers get more than $2,000 a month (and a minuscule 1 percent get more than $2,500).  Social Security benefits are low by international standards, too.

With the continued decline of the traditional defined-benefit pension, Social Security is the only retirement income most Americans will collect that’s indexed to inflation and guaranteed to last as long as they live.  And because it’s not means-tested, Social Security encourages people to supplement their retirement income by working part-time or by saving money.

Social Security faces a long-term shortfall that’s predictable and manageable.  Those who fear that Social Security won’t be around when today’s young workers retire misunderstand the trustees’ projections.  Even if policymakers did nothing, the program could still pay three-quarters of scheduled benefits after the trust funds run out in 2033.

Of course, policymakers should act well before then to place this popular program on sound long-term footing.  The best proposals would protect vulnerable workers and beneficiaries and give all participants ample notice of future changes to this vital program. And a well-crafted package would also make targeted improvements to the Supplemental Security Income program — which is distinct from Social Security but has important overlaps.

Social Security is the most effective and successful income-security program in the nation’s history.  The President and Congress should design reforms judiciously so that it remains that way.

Print Friendly

More About Kathy Ruffing

Kathy Ruffing

Kathy Ruffing is a Senior Fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, specializing in federal budget issues.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at CBPP.org

4 Comments Add Yours ↓

Comments are listed in reverse chronological order.

  1. 1

    I practice almost exclusively in this area of law and I know from experience that it is largely misunderstood and misrepresented. Social Security is the one government program that lives up to its name. Without it, we would return to a time of shanty towns, soup lines longer than they already are and homelessness rates in the double digits. This program is worth protecting and should be recognized for offering all citizens, even those who don’t rely on it a better quality of life.

  2. 2

    Great article as usual. CBPP is one of the best organizations we have. One issue that is seldom mentioned, the poverty of surviving spouses. When one spouse dies and income is cut in half (may be more or less than that), expenses are not cut in half, they fall only about 30%. The surviving spouse often has too little income to pay the bills and at an age where he/she has few alternatives. This may be one reason why people die soon after their spouse dies. People need to address this issue with good ideas and actions. E.g. room mate services, financial advice, low cost housing, elderly services. See my website: http://kr-eldercare.blogspot.com/

    • Kathy Ruffing #
      3

      Thanks, Doug, for the compliment! You raise an important point about widows’ and widowers’ benefits. The drop in Social Security benefits after one spouse dies ranges from one-third (for a one-earner couple) to one-half (for a couple who had roughly equal earnings). That’s one reason widows have higher poverty rates than married women—though not as high as divorced and never-married women. We hope to write more about this issue in the future, but in the meantime, you might like to look at some research (click on “survivor”) here.

  3. 4

    More information can be found here based on a poll illustrating what Americans want from Social Security: http://bit.ly/AmericansAgree.



Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact communications@cbpp.org.




nine − 3 =

 characters available