Why the Tax System Is Doing Less About Growing Inequality

November 4, 2011 at 1:30 pm

As we have explained, the joint congressional “supercommittee” — and any future efforts at deficit reduction — should raise significant revenues, and do so progressively.  A recent Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report highlights why.

It shows not only that income inequality has dramatically increased in recent decades (a point that we have previously discussed), but also that “the increase in inequality of after-tax income was greater than the increase in inequality of before-tax income.”  That is, the federal tax system as a whole did less to equalize the distribution of income in 2007 than it did in 1979.

There are three reasons why:

  1. The share of federal revenues coming from regressive payroll taxes has gone up. The federal tax system is progressive — meaning that higher-income taxpayers pay more of their income, on average, than low- and moderate-income taxpayers.  But the report explains that “[v]irtually all of the progressivity of the federal tax system derives from the individual income tax.  And the share of federal revenues coming from income taxes fell between 1979 and 2007, while the share coming from payroll taxes — which low- and middle-income families generally pay at a higher rate than high-income households — rose.  This shift from income taxes to payroll taxes made the tax system as a whole less progressive.
  2. The payroll tax has become slightly more regressive, but the income tax has become only slightly more progressive at the same time. The payroll tax has become slightly more regressive because lower-income households derived a greater share of their income from earnings that are subject to the payroll tax in 2007 than in 1979.
  3. Federal tax revenues have fallen as a share of total household income. While the federal tax system is, as we have said, progressive, its ability to alleviate the widening income gap has weakened over the last three decades as federal revenues levels have shrunk as a share of household income.

Given how extreme inequality has become, Congress needs to reverse course and make the tax code more progressive.

Related Posts:

Print Friendly

More About Chye-Ching Huang

Chye-Ching Huang

Chye-Ching Huang is a tax policy analyst with the Center’s Federal Fiscal Policy Team, where she focuses on the fiscal and economic effects of federal tax policy. You can follow her on Twitter @dashching.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at CBPP.org

Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact communications@cbpp.org.




− six = 2

 characters available