Higher Taxes on Wealthy Won’t Drive New Yorkers Away

October 19, 2011 at 5:01 pm

New York’s highest-income residents will see their taxes fall at the end of this year in part because of the governor’s misplaced fear that unless this happens, they’ll flee the state.

New York imposed a temporary surcharge on incomes over $200,000 ($300,000 for couples) several years ago to help close large budget shortfalls resulting from the recession and its aftermath.  But that surcharge is set to expire at the end of December, in the middle of the fiscal year, and lawmakers have thus far opted to let it end, even though the state’s budget woes continue.  This was a big part of the reason why the state made deep cuts to public services in the current budget, including a $1.3 billion cut in aid for local school districts.

With an additional $2 billion budget shortfall projected for next fiscal year, starting April 1, extending the surcharge would help to prevent this year’s deep cuts from getting even deeper.  The Assembly speaker, Sheldon Silver, has proposed extending the surcharge only for incomes over $1 million, and a poll released this week found that 72 percent of New Yorkers back the idea.

Governor Cuomo, however, has refused to consider any extension, arguing that high-income people and businesses would simply move to other states.  “We have competitors.  You can move from New York to Connecticut, you can move to New Jersey,” he said recently.

As we’ve pointed out, this “tax flight” argument is a myth — the evidence doesn’t support Cuomo’s claim that higher taxes will drive the wealthy out of a state.

In fact, perhaps the most carefully designed study on the impact of tax increases on state-to-state migration focuses on neighboring New Jersey’s 2004 tax increase on filers with incomes over $500,000.  It found that at most, 70 filers earning more than $500,000 might have left New Jersey between 2004 and 2007 because of the tax increase, costing the state an estimated $16.4 million in revenue — a drop in the bucket compared to the state’s estimated $3.77 billion revenue gain from the tax increase.

Extending the current tax rate on New York’s highest earners won’t lead to an exodus of the rich.  Instead, it will bring in significant, badly needed revenue, helping to sustain services like education that are essential to maintaining residents’ quality of life.

Print Friendly

More About Phil Oliff

Phil Oliff

Oliff joined the Center as a Policy Analyst with the State Fiscal Project and his work includes tracking state revenue collections and property tax issues, among other areas.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at CBPP.org

1 Comments Add Yours ↓

Comments are listed in reverse chronological order.

  1. 1

    As with everything else in politics, all you need is one highly-publicized example to “prove” your point. The NYS “tax flight” poster boy is Tom Galisano, who took his millions to Florida rather than pay NYS taxes– according to him. Who’s to say he wouldn’t have moved to Florida anyways? Nobody. But those who decry higher taxation on the rich can always point to him as the rule, rather than the exception, even if data proove otherwise.



Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact communications@cbpp.org.




− 1 = five

 characters available