The Need to Rebalance Federal Housing Policy, Part 2: Affordability Worsening For Low-Income Renters

July 17, 2012 at 4:43 pm

The first installment of this blog series explained why it’s the right time to establish a federal renters’ tax credit.  Today, we look at the affordability problems that low-income renters encounter.

Over the past several decades, the nation’s housing policy has focused predominantly on increasing homeownership — particularly for people who typically could afford to buy a home without subsidies.  Meanwhile, low-income renters have increasingly struggled to afford housing.

More than 7 million low-income families without rental assistance pay more than half their income for housing, the threshold for being considered “severely cost burdened.”  That number is up 42 percent since 2001 and is part of a long-term trend of worsening renter affordability (see chart).

Moreover, renters are far more likely than homeowners to struggle with severe housing cost burdens, even at the same income levels.  Renters are more than twice as likely as owners to pay more than half their income for housing, according to Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing Studies.  While the rates of severely cost-burdened households among both renters and owners grew during the last decade, affordability worsened for a larger share of renters than owners.  Among the poorest fifth of households — those with incomes below about $20,000 — a larger share of renters than owners are severely cost burdened.

At the same time that rents are rising, renter incomes are not.  If these trends persist, current affordability problems for renters will continue or worsen.

When housing costs are too high, families lack sufficient income to meet other basic needs and are more likely to experience homelessness and housing instability — problems that harm children’s long-term health and development.  The effect on low-income renters can be severe and enduring, as we’ll discuss in a subsequent post.

Supply shortages in some housing markets exacerbate the pressure on rents, making it important to address supply imbalances through policy tools such as reform of land-use regulations and subsidies for housing development.  But the underlying problem is that many low-income renters cannot afford housing that meets current safety and acceptability standards.  The most direct way to address this problem is through subsidies — such as the renters’ tax credit that we propose in our new paper — that help reduce the gap between market rents and the rent that low-income families can afford.

Tomorrow, we’ll take a closer look at how existing supports for low-income renters fall short.

Print Friendly

More About Barbara Sard

Barbara Sard

Sard rejoined the Center as Vice President for Housing Policy in 2011 after 18 months as Senior Advisor on Rental Assistance to HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at

1 Comments Add Yours ↓

Comments are listed in reverse chronological order.

  1. 1

    Poverty hurts children. It is detrimental to their physical and metal health. It can impact their educational outcomes (e.g. it is really hard to study in a cramped living situation). And, poverty simply reduces the number of opportunities children have.

    This blog post taken together with your recent report on the benefits of a federal Renters’ Credit make some choices quite clear for policy makers. We can continue to force families to devote far too much of their income for housing; or we can better align our housing policies with other policy objectives.

    Right now, housing subsidies are scarce. You suggest a great source of funding to greatly increase the supply while giving states the opportunity to improve the outcomes of households requiring TANF or reduce the use of the foster care system or help families move closer to job opportunities or simply live better lives.

    Thank you for your incredibly useful research.

Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact

one + = 6

 characters available