Working-Family Tax Relief in Tax-Cut Deal Would Keep 2 Million People Above Poverty Line

December 10, 2010 at 5:34 pm

Three major tax benefits for middle- and lower-income working Americans in the tax-cut deal between President Obama and Republican leaders (that go beyond extending the Bush tax cuts) would keep more than 2 million Americans above the poverty line and reduce the severity of poverty for 19 million more, Center analysis finds.

The three provisions are a temporary payroll tax cut and temporary extensions of the 2009 Recovery Act improvements in the Child Tax Credit (CTC) and Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC).  In 2011, they would:

  • keep the family incomes (after subtracting federal income and payroll taxes) of 2.4 million Americans, including 1.2 million children, above the official poverty line; and
  • lessen the severity of poverty for 19.4 million poor Americans, including 7.2 million children, by lifting their incomes closer to the poverty line.

By itself, the CTC provision would keep 1.3 million Americans above the poverty line; the EITC provision would keep over 300,000 out of poverty; and the payroll tax reduction would keep about 900,000 out of poverty.  (Continuing the Recovery Act’s Making Work Pay tax credit would have kept 500,000 more people out of poverty than the payroll tax reduction, but Republican leaders negotiating with President Obama were willing to extend Making Work Pay only as a non-refundable credit, which would have eliminated its poverty-reducing impact.)

The analysis assumes that without the agreement, the EITC and CTC would shrink in 2011 to the levels enacted in 2001.

To produce these estimates, we used Census Bureau survey data on 2009 incomes to calculate Americans’ taxes both with and without the expanded credits and payroll tax cut.  We subtracted federal income taxes and payroll taxes from income and then compared families’ resulting after-tax incomes with the Census Bureau’s official poverty threshold to determine their poverty status.  The official poverty line in 2009 was $21,954 for a family of four.  (Later this month the Census Bureau is expected to release additional data on estimated tax liability and an experimental poverty measurement, which will make improved comparisons possible.)

Next week I will release a more comprehensive analysis that includes the anti-poverty effects of another part of the deal, the unemployment insurance extension.

Print Friendly

More About Arloc Sherman

Arloc Sherman

Sherman is a Senior Researcher focusing on family income trends, income support policies, and the causes and consequences of poverty.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at

5 Comments Add Yours ↓

Comments are listed in reverse chronological order.

  1. Diane Hebert #

    I disagree and so do many others.The National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare is very concerned about the “Tax Holiday” and what it could mean for Social Security in the long run.Please visit their site for an in depth explanation.This tax cut deal was made behind closed doors without extended public debates. Tax cuts for the wealthy at this time is just plain crazy and irresponsible. Congress needs to stay in session and have a public debate.Thousands of people have signed petitions and made calls to their senators asking them to oppose this version.It’s time to let the House know that this deal is not in the best interest of the majority of people and must be ammended. Transparency works well when you;re negotiating,unless you make over a million dollars,I guess.It’s a Terrible Deal for most of us.

  2. Dorothy Rissman #

    This is indeed good news. thank you.

  3. Loonesta #

    America has over 310 million people and around 45 million live at the poverty line, so these figures are hardly encouraging.

  4. 4

    Pass the tax bill. It’s going to be a help to the economy and help create jobs. There are parts of this that I don’t like, but the inportant thing is that it will help the recovery.

  5. 5

    keep up the good work………….kudos, KAREN H.

Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact

+ 7 = eleven

 characters available