The “Supercommittee” and Medicare

August 18, 2011 at 3:27 pm

As the new congressional deficit-reduction committee considers proposals to cut Medicare spending, it needs to keep two critical — but often overlooked — facts in mind.

First, the problem of rising health costs affects the entire health care system, public and private.  In recent decades, Medicare and private-sector health care costs have grown at about the same rate per beneficiary (see chart), which shouldn’t be surprising since they use the same doctors, hospitals, and medical procedures.  In fact, Medicare has been a leader in adopting cost-control policies that private insurers have then widely adopted.

Second, health reform — the Affordable Care Act (ACA) — holds the potential to vastly improve Medicare’s long-term financial outlook.  If the law’s Medicare savings fully materialize, they will close four-fifths of the long-term shortfall in Medicare’s Hospital Insurance program.  And they will shrink Medicare’s total cost in 2035 by more than one-fifth — from 7.2 percent to 5.6 percent of gross domestic product — according to Medicare’s trustees.

To achieve these savings, the ACA establishes a host of new initiatives that aim to transform Medicare into a program that rewards health care providers based on the value of their care, not the volume of their procedures.  These include bundling payments for episodes of care, reducing avoidable hospital readmissions, testing and implementing new ways to increase the value of care, coordinating care under Medicare and Medicaid, informing patients and payers about the quality of health care providers, and increasing funding for comparative effectiveness research.  The law also creates an Independent Payment Advisory Board that will develop and submit proposals to reduce cost growth and improve quality in both Medicare and the health care system as a whole.

These reforms will take time to plan, test, and implement.  But they can succeed only if we give them a chance, and that won’t happen if health reform opponents succeed in repealing them.

Even if all of the ACA’s savings materialize, we’ll need to do more over the long run to slow the growth of health care costs in the private and public sectors alike.  In the near term, however, achieving large additional savings will be difficult, since the ACA includes most of the good ideas for slowing the growth of Medicare spending.  Other proposals, like increasing the age of eligibility for Medicare or replacing the program with vouchers that wouldn’t keep pace with health costs, would generally just shift costs to beneficiaries, states, and employers — and in many cases would increase total health care spending.

Given the limited possibilities for more Medicare cuts in the next five to ten years, the congressional “supercommittee” needs to develop a balanced package of deficit-reduction measures, including significant additional revenues, to reach its goal of achieving $1.2 to $1.5 trillion in deficit savings over the next ten years.

Print Friendly

More About Paul N. Van de Water

Paul N. Van de Water

Paul N. Van de Water is a Senior Fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, where he specializes in Medicare, Social Security, and health coverage issues.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at CBPP.org

3 Comments Add Yours ↓

Comments are listed in reverse chronological order.

  1. Paul Van de Water #
    1

    There’s a nice bar chart in the paper linked in the third paragraph of the blog. The underlying estimates come from the Office of the Actuary the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. You’ll find it here:
    http://democrats.waysandmeans.house.gov/media/pdf/112/OACTMemoonHIDeficitUnderACARepeal6-21-11.pdf.

  2. 2

    Is their some way to get the republicans to understand this?
    Or are they so committed to the insurance money that it doesn’t matter because they don’t care about our country and hate our government and the people in America so much it doesn’t matter?

    Used to be our representatives represented the citizens. Now I think they represent the corporations against us.

    I hope they will come back to their right minds again and will do the right thing!

  3. Mike Hayes #
    3

    I wish that it were possible to find a link from this article which, among other topics, discusses the improvements in Medicare funding that are already approved (for example, “…If the law’s Medicare savings fully materialize, they will close four-fifths of the long-term shortfall in Medicare’s Hospital Insurance program…”) to a rough draft Email to Members of Congress, either on the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities website or some other website.

    Then, individuals like myself could utilize the factual information that is referred to in this article in our communications with our respective Members of Congress.

    That might persuade some Members of Congress to be more supportive of the progress toward continuation of Medicare for future generations that has already occurred, by supporting additional necessary steps.



Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact communications@cbpp.org.




+ one = 8

 characters available