Slowing of Health Care Spending Is Good News for the Budget

January 8, 2014 at 12:53 pm

Health spending growth in 2012 remained low for the fourth consecutive year, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) reports, continuing a slowdown that has already contributed to a marked improvement in the federal budget outlook.  And, while no one knows how long the slowdown will continue (some analysts attribute it primarily to fundamental changes in the health care system, others to the recession), the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has concluded that at least part of it is likely to be long-lasting.

“The slowdown in health care cost growth,” CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf wrote in September, “has been sufficiently broad and persistent to persuade us to make significant downward revisions to our projections of federal health care spending.”

Since March 2010, CBO has lowered projected Medicare spending in 2020 by $137 billion (15 percent) and projected Medicaid spending by $85 billion (16 percent).  Over the 2010- 2020 period, CBO has lowered its projections of Medicare and Medicaid spending by $1.2 trillion (see graph).

Early reports suggest that the cost slowdown that CMS reported for 2012 continued in 2013.  Medicare spending grew by only 2.3 percent in fiscal year 2013, after adjusting for temporary shifts in the timing of certain payments.  That’s less than the increase in the number of Medicare beneficiaries.

To be sure, Medicare and Medicaid spending — even if cost growth remains moderate — will keep rising as more baby boomers become eligible for benefits.  Making the U.S. health care system more efficient thus remains a major budget challenge.

But CBO’s projections show that Medicare and Medicaid are not in crisis.  Responsible reforms, such as those in President Obama’s budget (which would produce $400 billion in health care entitlement savings in the next ten years and $1 trillion in savings in the subsequent decade), can help restore fiscal responsibility without shifting costs to vulnerable beneficiaries or states.  There’s no need for sweeping and misguided changes such as establishing a per capita cap in Medicaid or raising Medicare’s eligibility age.

Print Friendly

More About Paul N. Van de Water

Paul N. Van de Water

Paul N. Van de Water is a Senior Fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, where he specializes in Medicare, Social Security, and health coverage issues.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at

Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact

× two = 10

 characters available