Sequestration’s Toll: 70,000 Fewer Low-Income Families Have Housing Vouchers

February 26, 2014 at 12:26 pm

Some 70,000 fewer low-income families used housing vouchers to rent private housing in December than a year earlier, according to new CBPP projections.  The projections, based on new Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) data, show that low-income seniors, people with disabilities, and families with children continue to feel the effects of the across-the-board sequestration cuts, which started last March.  The big question now is whether the President and Congress will reverse these cuts next year.

We estimate that roughly three-fourths of state and local housing agencies have had to shrink the number of families they help due to sequestration, which cut funding for the Housing Choice Voucher Program by nearly $1 billion last year.  The map below provides state-by-state figures on the lost vouchers; see this table (in .pdf or .xls format) for more details.

These cuts come at a particularly bad time.  The number of renter households paying unaffordable housing costs is at historic highs, according to a new report by Harvard’s Joint Center for Housing Studies, which warns that the “spread of severe cost burdens [where renters pay more than half their income for housing] during the Great Recession and its aftermath is particularly alarming.”

Also, homelessness remains widespread.  More than 600,000 Americans, including some 58,000 veterans and 138,000 children, are living either in emergency shelters or on the street on any given day, according to HUD’s latest count.  Housing instability and homelessness can have a debilitating impact on children over the long term, and rigorous research shows that housing vouchers are highly effective at reducing these conditions among low-income families.

December’s Murray-Ryan budget agreement provided partial relief from sequestration for 2014 and 2015.  But in 2014, that relief will enable housing agencies to restore fewer than half of the vouchers cut in 2013 due to sequestration.  It is therefore essential that policymakers provide sufficient funds in 2015 to fully reverse sequestration’s harmful effects on the voucher program.

Print Friendly

More About Douglas Rice

Douglas Rice

As a Senior Policy Analyst, Rice's work focuses on the impact of federal housing policy on low-income families.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at

Douglas Rice

1 Comments Add Yours ↓

Comments are listed in reverse chronological order.

  1. Jennifer #

    Given the government shutdown and the actors involved in the process, how would you describe the role of the different actors in the shutdown are playing?
    Are new policies emerging as a direct result of the sequestration? If so, what are those policies?

Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact

3 − = zero

 characters available