Robin Hood in Reverse Strikes Again

September 6, 2011 at 2:24 pm

Yet another state has proposed raising taxes on low-income residents to pay for new corporate tax breaks.  Leading lawmakers in Missouri want to eliminate a property tax credit for low- and moderate-income seniors and people with disabilities in order to help finance new tax credits for businesses.

Sadly, swaps like this are increasingly common; both Michigan and Wisconsin have cut low-income programs this year to pay for business tax breaks.

The Missouri proposal, which the legislature will consider in a special session that begins today, would make renters ineligible for the state’s property tax “circuitbreaker” credit.  Landlords generally pass along a large share of their property taxes to tenants in the form of higher rents; the circuitbreaker credit helps offset those higher rents for more than 100,000 low-income and disabled Missouri residents.  (Homeowners are also eligible for the credit, but this proposal wouldn’t affect them.)  Some 29 states offer property tax circuitbreakers or similar programs.

Killing this tax credit would raise taxes on some of Missouri’s most vulnerable residents by up to $750 a year.  It would also hurt local retailers and other businesses, since low-income people are among those most likely to spend every dollar they have.  That’s not a smart deal for Missouri.

Print Friendly

More About Phil Oliff

Phil Oliff

Oliff joined the Center as a Policy Analyst with the State Fiscal Project and his work includes tracking state revenue collections and property tax issues, among other areas.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at

2 Comments Add Yours ↓

Comments are listed in reverse chronological order.

  1. Mike #

    The idea that business create jobs is incorrect. After all, the purpose of businesses is to create a customer and then satisfy customer demand. So, it is customer demand which creates jobs. By extension, if there is no customer demand, there is no need to hire workers (The current condition of the U.S. Economy). Naturally, Robin Hood in reverse only works to destroy the economy by further eroding demand. I think even Milton Freedman would have to agree there.

  2. Chris #

    Quick question: who gives people jobs and the ability to pay income taxes…oh yeah business…thanks Econ

Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact

9 − two =

 characters available