Required Reading for Tomorrow’s Senate Tax Cut Hearing

July 13, 2010 at 4:40 pm

Tomorrow morning the Senate Finance Committee begins debate on what to do with the Bush tax cuts, which are set to expire at the end of the year.  Here’s some homework to prepare for this important hearing:

  • The long-term budget picture. The Congressional Budget Office has updated its long-term forecast showing that our country is on an unsustainable course.  The report concludes, “Keeping deficits and debt from growing to unsustainable levels would require raising revenues as a percentage of GDP significantly above past levels, reducing outlays sharply relative to CBO’s projections, or some combination of those approaches.”

  • The cost of the Bush tax cuts. Relying on CBO data, we have highlighted the large role that the Bush tax cuts have played in the fiscal deterioration of recent years — and their large ongoing cost if Congress extends all of them.  In 2019 alone, for example, the tax cuts would cost over $700 billion (including the added interest payments on the national debt), or more than half of the roughly $1.3 trillion deficit we project for that year if the federal government continues current tax and spending policies.  Our report also acts as a corrective to an op-ed in today’s Wall Street Journal that tries to understate the tax cuts’ costs.
  • Tax cuts and the economy. A CBO study found that extending the Bush tax cuts for high-income filers would be less cost-effective in boosting growth and job creation than any other policy option it examined.  The President has proposed extending the tax cuts for families making under $250,000 but allowing the high-income tax cuts, which benefit the top 2 percent of families, to expire on schedule.  We explain here why letting the high-income tax cuts expire represents sound economic and fiscal policy.
  • Growing income gaps. Income inequality in the United States has exploded in recent decades, a recent Center report shows.  Between 1979 and 2007, average after-tax incomes rose by 281 percent for the top 1 percent of households but by just 25 percent for the middle fifth of households.  As our report explains, the Bush tax cuts have helped widen income inequality by raising after-tax incomes the most at the top of the income scale.
Print Friendly

More About Chuck Marr

Chuck Marr

Chuck Marr is the Director of Federal Tax Policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at

1 Comments Add Yours ↓

Comments are listed in reverse chronological order.

  1. jonathan #

    And the argument is already being made that the tax cuts didn’t cost and caused growth. While in this case I think it’s important to make the factual arguments about the reality of the negative impact, a simpler point is that we need to try it and see. We have had recent experience without these tax cuts. The economy did very well and government finances improved tremendously. Maybe, just maybe that was an aberration but we can’t know unless we give it another whack. If it doesn’t work, then we can always cut taxes later. This would be the prudent step.

Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact

1 + = six

 characters available