Put High Income Tax Cuts Back on the Budget Negotiating Table

March 7, 2011 at 5:15 pm

We’ve previously discussed how the House Republican proposal to cut $66 billion in non-security discretionary spending — everything from K-12 education to clean water funds to medical research — in the current fiscal year (2011) would affect millions of middle- and lower-income families in communities all across America.

We shouldn’t think of that proposal in isolation, however.  In December, congressional Republicans demanded that Congress enact a two-year extension of President Bush’s tax cuts for people making over $250,000 – which will cost about the same amount as their proposed cuts to non-security discretionary spending for this year – as part of the year-end tax and unemployment insurance agreement.

When you think about how these priorities affect real people, you might ask yourself why no one in Washington who wants to save about $66 billion or so seems willing to talk about reversing these tax cuts at the top.  Consider the following three illustrative Americans:

Our first American is a hedge fund trader who places informed bets on whether particular mergers and acquisitions will happen and at what price.  With the extension of Bush’s high-end tax cuts, he’ll continue to enjoy a $130,000 tax break, which is the average yearly tax break for people making over $1 million.  Were Congress to let the high-end tax cuts expire, this trader would pay a top tax rate of 39.6 percent – the rate in place under President Clinton during the booming 1990s – rather than his current 35 percent.

Our second American is a working class high school kid who plans to be the first in his family to go to college.  The House GOP’s proposal to cut Pell Grant funding by 24 percent would make it harder for him to afford it.  The proposal would cut the maximum grant by 15 percent this year and about 30 percent in 2014.

Our third American is the seven-year-old daughter of a single working parent who’s enrolled in an after-school program to get extra reading instruction.  For the girl, the House GOP’s proposed $100 million cut in 21st Century Challenge Grants, which fund reading instruction outside school hours to students who need extra help and live in high-poverty areas, means that she may have to find somewhere else to go after school.

Policymakers who want to save about $66 billion this year, or any year, do not merely have to cut non-security spending.  If they’re concerned about how different proposals would affect different Americans at different income levels, they should at least think about ending tax cuts that go to people who don’t really need them.  It is time to put the high-end tax cuts back on the budget table.

Print Friendly

More About Chuck Marr

Chuck Marr

Chuck Marr is the Director of Federal Tax Policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at CBPP.org

2 Comments Add Yours ↓

Comments are listed in reverse chronological order.

  1. Henry Bennett #

    It is well established that the biggest driving force of our balooning deficits is the Bush tax cuts. Although my income is WAY below $100,000 per year, I would gladly sacrifice my Bush tax cut if the tax cuts on the richest Americans were reversed also!

  2. Adrienne O'Niell #

    We breathe in and out. We eat. We care for our property. We do our jobs to the best of our ability. We walk on two legs. We speak from our mouths. We are no different than the wealthy. So, why are we treated as throw away scum? Why are we taxed at higher rates than the wealthy? Why do we not receive tax breaks? As a single person hoping to semi-retire this year, I am appalled that I have worked for 59 years and must continue working to afford even a semi-retirement. The cuts proposed by the Republicans hurt people even worse off than I am, and most of them through no fault of their own. I work for my community as a president of a neighborhood council to make things better for our people, and meanwhile, back in Washington, we are being sabotaged by wealthy political animals, looking to be certain they retain their wealth, while we worry about our next meals, the roofs over our heads. There is something terribly wrong with this picture. The job in DC requires that representatives and senators consider ALL of the citizens, not just a special group of wealthy corporations and persons. WAKE UP AND LOOK AROUND.

Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact communications@cbpp.org.

three + = 5

 characters available