On Emergency Jobless Benefits, Don’t Be Fooled by November’s Drop in Unemployment

December 10, 2013 at 12:18 pm

November’s drop in unemployment to 7.0 percent was obviously welcome, but policymakers should not conclude that they can now justifiably let federal emergency unemployment insurance (UI) expire at the end of this year.  That’s because a look only at the unemployment rate provides too optimistic a picture of the overall health of the labor market.

As I explained last week in my statement on November’s jobs report, labor market conditions are significantly better than in the depths of the Great Recession in 2008-2009, but they remain far from what they should be.  In a robust jobs recovery, the unemployment rate falls quickly and the share of the population with a job (the employment-population ratio, or employment rate) rises.  Not this time, as the chart shows.

The share of the population with a job, which plunged in the recession to levels last seen in the 1980s, has changed little in the ensuing four years.  The chart shows the employment rate for the population aged 16 and older, but a chart for just 25- to 54-year-olds in their prime working years would not look much better.

The recession drove many people out of the labor force, and lack of job opportunities in the ongoing jobs slump has kept many potential jobseekers on the sidelines.  Many of these people would like to work and, in a stronger labor market, they would likely have a job or at least be looking, but they are not looking actively enough to be counted as officially unemployed.  Their absence from the ranks of the officially unemployed keeps the unemployment rate lower than it otherwise would be.

The latest jobs report makes the point perfectly.  In November, labor force participation and employment surged and unemployment plunged.  But most of that progress merely reversed the government shutdown’s adverse impact on the October numbers.  Between September and November, the number of officially unemployed Americans fell by 348,000 but the number of people with a job rose by only 83,000.  The difference was a decline in the labor force of 265,000.  In other words, three-quarters of the drop in unemployment occurred through labor force shrinkage rather than employment growth.

That’s been the pattern since the recession officially ended in mid-2009.  Declining labor force participation (to rates last seen in 1978) has offset declining unemployment and kept the share of the population with a job from rebounding.

Jobs are hard to find and long-term unemployment remains a significant concern.  Nearly two-fifths (37.3 percent) of the 10.9 million people who are unemployed — 4.1 million people — have been looking for work for 27 weeks or longer.  These long-term unemployed represent 2.6 percent of the labor force.  Before this recession, the previous highs for these statistics over the past six decades were 26.0 percent and 2.6 percent, respectively, in June 1983.

At 2.6 percent, the long-term unemployment rate is at least twice as high as when any of the emergency federal UI programs that policymakers enacted in each of the previous seven major recessions expired (see chart).

Simply put, it’s too soon to let emergency UI benefits expire.

Print Friendly

More About Chad Stone

Chad Stone

Chad Stone is Chief Economist at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, where he specializes in the economic analysis of budget and policy issues. You can follow him on Twitter @ChadCBPP.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at CBPP.org

1 Comments Add Yours ↓

Comments are listed in reverse chronological order.

  1. DHFabian #

    Where do we draw the line? During economic downturns before Clinton, those whose UI expired before they could secure jobs turned to welfare. Welfare rolls went up, then back down as the job market improved. Welfare provided only a fraction of what UI provides, but it was usually enough to enable people to remain sheltered and fed until the economy improved. We ended this on the belief that, as Bill Clinton declared, “There is NO excuse for long-term joblessness.” The middle class applauded.

Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact communications@cbpp.org.

8 + nine =

 characters available