Hardship in America, 2013: Homelessness Remains High and Affordable Housing Is Increasingly Scarce

November 26, 2013 at 4:09 pm

Six years after the Great Recession began, the number of homeless families with children remains stubbornly high.  And the number of low-income households with unmet needs for housing assistance — especially families with children — has soared.  Funding cuts under sequestration threaten to halt progress against homelessness and worsen the shortage of affordable housing.

Let’s first look at the homelessness data:

  • Over 1.1 million children and youth were homeless during the 2011-2012 school year, according to the Department of Education.  Four-fifths were living in homes that were not their own and that may be crowded and unstable; the rest were living in homeless shelters or on the street, in cars, or in abandoned buildings.
  • The number of families with children in homeless shelters or temporary housing for the homeless jumped by 30 percent in the first two years of the recession (2007-2009) and remained only slightly below the 2009 level as of 2012, according to a Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) report.  This figure doesn’t include families who are doubling up with other households, even if they have to move every few weeks. 
  • HUD’s latest count of the number of people living on the streets or in shelters on one night in January showed a modest drop among families with children.  (The drop since 2007, however, was close to 25 percent each among people with disabilities and veterans.)  And one-night counts are less reliable than counts of the number of homeless households over a whole year.

Millions of families that aren’t homeless nonetheless face serious housing affordability problems.  More than 8 million low-income households who receive no federal housing assistance pay more than half of their income for rent and utilities (see chart).  That’s a 43 percent increase since 2007.

More than 2 million low-income households use vouchers to rent modest private-market housing at an affordable cost.  But low-income seniors, people with disabilities, and working families with children eligible for the voucher program often must wait years for assistance due to limited funding.

Sequestration is hitting both the voucher program and anti-homelessness efforts (as well as public housing and other areas).  Scheduled cuts in voucher funding could eliminate vouchers for as many as 185,000 low-income families by the end of 2014.  Cuts in the grants that communities use to help homeless people could force them to cut back efforts to prevent homelessness or re-house homeless families.  The voucher cuts also mean that many fewer families that are homeless or at imminent risk of homelessness will have access to vouchers.

Sequestration’s harmful impact on low-income housing is one of many reasons why budget negotiators should replace part or all of sequestration for the next year or two with alternative deficit-reduction measures.

Print Friendly

More About Barbara Sard

Barbara Sard

Sard rejoined the Center as Vice President for Housing Policy in 2011 after 18 months as Senior Advisor on Rental Assistance to HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at CBPP.org

2 Comments Add Yours ↓

Comments are listed in reverse chronological order.

  1. Nene #

    It’s sad that the government are taking from the poor and giving to the rich. This world is in chaos and we are living in the last days. God will not tolerate this foolishness among man any longer. We are in a battle between the rich and the poor and good and evil.

    The budget cuts took money from poor people just to make the rich richer. The economic gap between the rich and the poor is astounding. There is no middle income America now and things are about to get a lot worse.

  2. 2

    As you carefully document, homelessness remains high and millions of other
    families have a hard time paying for the essentials. This is directly due to the failure on the part of businesses to pay wages and salaries that keep up with the increased cost of transportation, food, housing, utilities, clothing, health care, education, etc. For over thirty years productivity has trended up and wages and salaries less so. Indeed wages and salaries are flat. I only know of managers who receive raises whereby they may maintain or raise their standard of living. The changes required have been discussed and both political parties have embraced austerity, which we know isn’t working. Until we embrace well-paying jobs and require employers to offer a pension plan, see to it that government increases the minimum wage to $15.00 per hour, increase health care subsidies under the Affordable Care Act, and, provide education that does not financially burden our young people, and, adopt trade policies that encourage investment in skilled jobs and manufacturing in this country, we are doomed to more of the same downhill race to the bottom. We have gradually walked away from social policies that would help to provide economic opportunity and, are continuing to do so.The only way to have jobs in America, as Roosevelt said, is to have jobs in America. We continue to ask unions to make concessions. The management class wins!The inequality will doom us.

Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact communications@cbpp.org.

6 − = one

 characters available