Even a Less Than “Pure” Territorial Tax System Carries Serious Risks

February 1, 2013 at 12:44 pm

A White House official told Politico yesterday that the President doesn’t support a “pure” territorial tax system, under which U.S.-based multinational corporations would face a zero or very low tax rate on their foreign profits.  That’s good news — but even a less than “pure” territorial system carries serious risks.

As our new report explains, U.S.-based multinationals already pay much lower taxes on their overseas profits than on their domestic profits.  A territorial tax system would give them an even greater incentive to invest overseas rather than in the United States and to shift U.S.-earned profits overseas.  That would risk hurting domestic businesses, boosting deficits over the long run, and weakening the economy.

Even “impure” territorial tax systems don’t completely avert these risks.  Many countries that supposedly have territorial systems actually have hybrid systems that tax substantial portions of their multinationals’ overseas profits, as well as other “tough” rules to make it harder for multinationals to avoid taxes by artificially shifting profits overseas.  These less than pure territorial tax systems are often referred to as “tough” territorial tax systems.  Yet, these countries have found that multinationals can still shift profits to tax havens and avoid tax.

This problem is becoming increasingly pressing:

  • In recent weeks, policymakers in the UK, France, Germany, and Italy have been “cracking down on U.S.-based multinational companies such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon, claiming they pay little or no tax in Europe in spite of generating billions in revenue there.”
  • The European Union is considering steps to address this problem, possibly by coordinating member states’ rules for taxing multinational profits so that all corporate income is sourced to some country.
  • British Prime Minister David Cameron has promised to use his country’s year-long presidency of the G8 group of large economies (which includes the United States) to target tax avoidance.
  • A strikingly direct November 2012 release from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) pressed developed countries to rethink the “very fundamentals” of their (predominantly territorial) tax rules, noting that in many cases multinational profits aren’t taxed anywhere.

Particularly given the problems that other countries are having with even “tough” territorial systems, the United States shouldn’t move in the territorial direction.

Print Friendly

More About Chye-Ching Huang

Chye-Ching Huang

Chye-Ching Huang is a tax policy analyst with the Center’s Federal Fiscal Policy Team, where she focuses on the fiscal and economic effects of federal tax policy. You can follow her on Twitter @dashching.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at CBPP.org

Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact communications@cbpp.org.




+ seven = 12

 characters available