Defunding State Health Insurance Exchanges Would Slow Health Reform

April 24, 2012 at 4:13 pm

The House voted almost a year ago to undercut the Affordable Care Act by repealing its grants to help states set up “exchanges,” the new marketplaces that will allow individuals and small businesses to choose among a number of private health insurance plans.  (The measure didn’t go anywhere in the Senate.)

Here we go again.

The House Energy and Commerce Committee is preparing to vote this week on a similar provision, part of a bill to cut mandatory spending as the House-passed budget plan requires.  (We blogged about another provision of that bill earlier today.)

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) predicted last year that repealing the exchange grants would delay state efforts to set up the exchanges, which are scheduled to be up and running on January 1, 2014.  As a result, CBO estimated, 2 million fewer people would participate in the exchanges in 2015, which means fewer low- and moderate-income people would receive federal help with premiums, deductibles, and other cost-sharing charges to make coverage more affordable.

A number of states are moving forward to set up exchanges and are using the exchange grants to support their efforts; 34 states have received establishment grants as of April 16.  Congress shouldn’t undermine this important part of health reform.

Print Friendly

More About Sarah Lueck

Sarah Lueck

Lueck joined the Center in November 2008 as a Senior Policy Analyst.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at CBPP.org

Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact communications@cbpp.org.




6 − = zero

 characters available