What Agreement on $2 Trillion in Spending Cuts?

July 12, 2011 at 1:33 pm

Tea party stalwarts and some Republican presidential candidates notwithstanding, experts generally agree that Congress’ failure to raise the federal debt limit by early August to avert a default would seriously hurt the economy and the nation.  But Republican lawmakers’ refusal to vote for an increase unless it’s accompanied by a major deficit reduction package has kept Congress from acting.  That, however, is not what you might think after listening to some recent commentary about the debt limit negotiations.

After House Speaker John Boehner decided to oppose President Obama’s effort to secure a $4 trillion package because it would involve a tax increase, some pundits suggested the President and Congress can simply enact the purported $2 trillion in spending cuts to which all sides agreed as part of the bipartisan talks that Vice President Biden had led.  They seem to suggest that the President and congressional Democrats will bear the blame for a default if they do not agree to enact the spending cuts.

There’s just one problem: there was no agreement on $2 trillion in spending cuts in the talks that included high-ranking House and Senate members of both parties.

I wasn’t there, of course, but the House Budget Committee’s ranking member, Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), was. And here’s what he told Candy Crowley on CNN’s “State of the Union”:

In fact, the Vice President has said that we identified about a trillion in savings.  We’re nowhere close to $2.4 trillion. . . .  And let me say this, even that trillion was contingent on an overall agreement which meant that the Republicans had to agree to some revenue component.

The Biden talks had to start somewhere, and participants decided to start on the spending side. Democratic negotiators discussed the spending cuts they could support as part of a balanced package of spending cuts and revenue increases.  After discussing spending, the group would move to revenues.  But, after participants made some progress on the spending side — which, Van Hollen said, consisted of about $1 trillion in possible cuts — Republicans broke off the talks, saying they would not consider any tax increases.

Suggesting Democrats should be blamed if Congress does not raise the debt limit because they were willing to talk about spending cuts while letting Republicans off the hook for refusing to talk about tax increases would turn reality upside down, marking a clear case of “no good deed going unpunished.”

Print Friendly

More About James Horney

James Horney

Jim Horney is the Vice President for Federal Fiscal Policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, where he specializes in federal budget issues.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at CBPP.org

1 Comments Add Yours ↓

Comments are listed in reverse chronological order.

  1. 1

    AMAZING ALL THIS “NOISE”, BUT NOT ONE WORD OF REDUCING WEAPONS SPENDING; Not reducing the F-35 @ over $100,000,000 per aircraft..and growing even more expensive.

    And the C-17, which the Military did NOT WANT…and we plan to build like or not…and the VTOL Osprey and how many Aircraft Carriers…does anyone know…and are the terrorists fearful of them….really!

    How many troops in Germany ? And Okinawa, for what purpose…I thought we were through with the war in Germany some years ago…who are we protecting ? The people of Okinawa have repeatedly asked us to LEAVE !! but we intend to protect them and Korea WHICH HAS a massive military..over 1/2 million, I believe…check that number and the troops in Germany which I understand is over 60,000 …and 40,000 in Okinawa…WHY ?

    Here in Ventura California, the Military is the largest employer, by far..therefore, there will never be a reduction…we have become literally grafted to this spending….and that will probably never change. So, let us cut Social Security, Medicare, U/E insurance payments….that is the Governments answer..at least one Political Party….less for education, less for any social needs..infracture falling into disrepair ! DO WE HAVE ANY IDEA OF JUST WHERE THIS NATION IS HEADED? I would think we will follow Soviet Russia, which sank under the weight of Military Spending and foreign intrusions !



Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact communications@cbpp.org.




two × 3 =

 characters available