Staged Vote on Clean Debt Limit Increase a Step Backward

May 31, 2011 at 3:42 pm

House Republican leaders have scheduled a vote today on a “clean” debt limit increase—one that doesn’t tie the increase to other changes in budget or tax policies or other matters.  President Obama and Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner have asked repeatedly for such a  “clean bill” as the best way to assure that the debt limit is raised in a timely fashion, and to avoid uncertainty that could spook financial markets and harm the economy. So the scheduling of this vote is good news, right? Actually, no.

House Republican leaders scheduled the clean debt limit increase vote for one reason:  to defeat it.  They believe this will support their strategy of holding a debt limit increase hostage to enactment of a deficit-reduction package they favor that would impose deep cuts in Medicare, Medicaid, and other important programs while protecting Bush-era tax cuts for the wealthiest taxpayers and various dubious tax breaks for large corporations and other special interests.

The White House and Congress need to enact a debt limit increase in a timely manner to reassure the financial markets and the world at large that the United States will never renege on its obligations.  Policymakers also need to prevent deficits in coming years and decades from swelling to levels that will damage the economy and the federal government’s ability to meet the nation’s needs.  But the vote that House Republicans have planned for today will not move us toward either of these goals.

Instead, today’s expected defeat of a clean debt limit increase could boost fears that a large number of lawmakers are willing to risk substantial long-term harm to the economy and the reputation of the United States.

By encouraging Republican leaders to continue their refusal to consider any increase in revenues as part of deficit reduction, a defeat also may make it harder to begin serious negotiations over a balanced deficit-reduction package of sensible budget cuts and revenue increases — the sort of package that most thoughtful budget experts agree is the only way to deal effectively with our long-term fiscal problems.

Print Friendly

More About James Horney

James Horney

Jim Horney is the Vice President for Federal Fiscal Policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, where he specializes in federal budget issues.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at

Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact

eight − = 1

 characters available