Recent Spending Cuts Outweigh Tax Increases 3 to 1

March 20, 2014 at 12:33 pm

We noted Policy savings to reduce deficits largely come from program cutsyesterday that legislative changes account for most of the nearly $5 trillion decline since 2010 in projected deficits for the 2015-2024 decade.  Those legislative changes, in turn, consisted mostly of program cuts, which outweigh revenue increases 77 percent to 23 percent (see graph).

This lopsided 3 to 1 ratio strongly suggests that further deficit reduction should place greater emphasis on revenue increases.  And the deductions, exclusions, preferential rates, and other tax breaks known collectively as tax expenditures are ripe for reform.

The four major pieces of deficit-reduction legislation enacted since the fall of 2010 were the Budget Control Act of 2011, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 (also known as the Murray-Ryan deal), and this year’s farm bill.

Altogether, they cut projected deficits over 2015-2024 by $4.1 trillion: about $3.2 trillion from program cuts (including the associated interest savings) and $950 billion from higher revenues (again, including the interest savings).

See our new paper for details.

Print Friendly

More About William Chen

William Chen

William Chen joined the Center in August 2012 as a Research Associate with the Federal Fiscal Policy division.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at CBPP.org

Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact communications@cbpp.org.




one + 1 =

 characters available