Projected Medicare Spending Has Fallen by More than $500 Billion

February 19, 2013 at 3:35 pm

Here’s some good news on the fiscal front:  projected Medicare spending over the 2011-2020 period has fallen by more than $500 billion since late 2010 — based on a comparison of the latest Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projections with those of August 2010.

That’s important to remember because it was in late 2010 — and based on CBO’s August 2010 projections — when Fiscal Commission co-chairs Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson issued their original budget proposal, calling for slightly more than $300 billion in Medicare spending cuts through 2020.  The original Bowles-Simpson proposal is often considered an appropriate starting point in evaluating whether other deficit-reduction proposals should be viewed as responsible approaches to the deficit problem.

The figure below compares CBO’s August 2010 projection with its new one.  We exclude both the deep cut in physician fees required by Medicare’s sustainable growth rate (SGR) formula and also the impending budget cuts known as sequestration.  The resulting Medicare baseline projections are consistent with each other and with the baselines used by other budget analysts, such as Bowles-Simpson, the Bipartisan Policy Center, and the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.

CBO has reduced its projections of Medicare spending in response to a pattern of very low spending growth in the past three years.  Medicare spending per beneficiary in fiscal year 2012 increased by only 0.4 percent — well below the 3.4-percent growth in gross domestic product (GDP) per capita.  Over the 2010-2012 period, Medicare spending per beneficiary grew at an annual rate of 1.9 percent, while GDP per capita increased by 3.2 percent a year.  CBO projects that Medicare cost growth will remain subdued for the rest of the decade.

Medicare spending growth has slowed even more than costs in private health insurance, according to Standard & Poor’s and Medicare’s actuary.  Although some of the slowdown stems from the recession, CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf and other experts have concluded that a substantial part reflects structural changes in the health care system.  Professional associations, hospitals, and doctors are taking steps to curb costly and ineffective procedures and treatment.

No one knows how long this good news will continue, but even if cost growth remains moderate, Medicare spending will keep rising as more baby boomers become eligible for benefits.  Making the U.S. health care system more efficient thus remains our biggest budget challenge.  Yet the recent spending data and CBO’s new projections belie claims that policymakers must radically restructure Medicare to put it on a sound financial footing.

Print Friendly

More About Paul N. Van de Water

Paul N. Van de Water

Paul N. Van de Water is a Senior Fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, where he specializes in Medicare, Social Security, and health coverage issues.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at

3 Comments Add Yours ↓

Comments are listed in reverse chronological order.

  1. 1

    I won’t hold my breath waiting to see the savings. When has the CBO ever been right?

    Plus, so what if Medicare spending is down? We all know that any savings from Medicare will simply be shifted to more spending for ObamaCare via Medicaid. It’s all a game at the taxpayer’s expense.

  2. 2

    It seems to me that the slow down in spending has a lot more to do with the economy than anything that the government has done via policy changes. I think it will be a few more years to see the effects that ACA makes (good or bad).

  3. 3

    I hope this doesn’t get leaders to slow down. They should double-down assuming there hasn’t been drops in quality/outcomes during this time. Whether you are an R motivated by eliminating gov’t waste (IOM states there is $750B *annually*) or a D motivated by better funding for education, environment, social programs, it’s time to double-down, not slow down reforms.

    Spending time with sr execs at providers, they all admit they could reduce spending 30% and quality wouldn’t suffer…they just don’t see the motivation to be the first. And obviously there are some tough decisions along the way. The volume-to-value revolution highlighted in Healthcare’s Trillion Dollar Disruption (aka DIY Health Reform) lays out how this could happen at a much greater scale –

Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact

8 + = thirteen

 characters available