Poverty Rate Would Have Been Nearly Twice as High in 2012 Without Safety Net, New Census Data Show

November 6, 2013 at 2:33 pm

Safety net programs cut poverty nearly in half in 2012, according to our analysis of Census data released today. The data illustrate the effectiveness of a broad range of government assistance programs, such as Social Security, rent subsidies, and tax credits for working families.

Earlier today, we highlighted the effects of two poverty-reducing programs, unemployment insurance and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly food stamps).  In this post, we broaden our focus a bit.

Counting all government assistance programs, the poverty rate drops from 29.1 percent to 16.0 percent, according to a CBPP analysis using the Census Bureau’s Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM), which accounts for taxes and non-cash government benefits.  The poverty rate for children drops from 29.8 percent to 18.0 percent after counting safety net programs (see chart).

By considering taxes and non-cash benefits, the SPM gives a truer picture of the effectiveness of anti-poverty programs than the official poverty measure, which counts only cash benefits and other cash income.  Policymakers should keep this effectiveness in mind as the President and Congress negotiate budget and tax priorities for the coming year and beyond.  Deep cuts to these programs would make them less effective at reducing poverty and would push the poverty rate significantly higher.

Print Friendly

More About Arloc Sherman

Arloc Sherman

Sherman is a Senior Researcher focusing on family income trends, income support policies, and the causes and consequences of poverty.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at CBPP.org

Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact communications@cbpp.org.

+ five = 10

 characters available