Poorest States Facing Cut in Federal Welfare Funding

June 27, 2011 at 4:25 pm

17 States Will No Longer Receive Funding from TANF Supplemental Grants

In a continued unraveling of Congress’ deal with the states when it enacted the 1996 welfare reform law, federal Supplemental Grants provided every year since 1996 to 17 states to augment their Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) block grant will expire this Friday, our new report explains.  These states include some of the poorest in the nation, with child poverty rates averaging 22 percent (see map).  Several have also been hit especially hard by the economic downturn; nine have unemployment rates above the 9.1 percent national average.

Here’s the background: unlike the AFDC program that it replaced, the TANF block grant gives each state a flat amount of federal funding each year that does not rise when the economy weakens, unemployment rises, and more families need help.  Moreover, since each state’s TANF funding level is based on how much it spent under AFDC, poor states get less than half as much funding per poor child as other states (see graph).

TANF Spending Per Poor Child Much Lower in Supplemental Grant States

To help address these problems, the framers of the 1996 welfare law created Supplemental Grants to provide extra funding to states that TANF’s funding formula places at a disadvantage, as well as a Contingency Fund to provide additional funds to states hit hard in bad economic times.

Neither of these additional funding streams will be available to states for the rest of fiscal year 2011, which runs through September 30.   The Contingency Fund was exhausted in December 2010.  The Supplemental Grants are now expiring as well.  (In a related matter, the temporary TANF Emergency Fund, which the 2009 Recovery Act created to help states respond to recession-related increases in need, also expired last September 30.)

This means that for the first time in TANF’s history, Congress is now providing no additional TANF funding to help states respond to the increase in need from a downturn or to address the funding inequities under the TANF block grant.  And, for the first time since AFDC’s creation in the 1930s, the federal government is offering no additional funding to states to help cover the higher need for AFDC- or TANF-funded help to poor families from an economic downturn.

By letting the Supplemental Grants expire, Congress risks weakening states’ ability to assist struggling families that have nowhere else to turn.  Congress also risks compromising states’ ability to maintain a strong work focus in their TANF programs as states consider cuts in work supports and work-related services to reduce costs.  This isn’t what policymakers intended when they enacted welfare reform in 1996.

Print Friendly

More About LaDonna Pavetti

LaDonna Pavetti

Dr. LaDonna Pavetti is the Vice President for Family Income Support Division at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at CBPP.org

2 Comments Add Yours ↓

Comments are listed in reverse chronological order.

  1. Mark Hillenbrand #
    1

    Congratulations to Congress for their continuing efforts to starve the poorest Americans out of existence! We should be so proud of them, and of us as a nation for constantly voting in this motley bunch!

  2. Donna Cooper #
    2

    Great inforamtion, should make governor’s nervous about blocking granting food stamps or medicaid or both!



Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact communications@cbpp.org.



 characters available