North Carolina’s Costly Cut in Jobless Benefits

February 14, 2013 at 5:18 pm

North Carolina, where unemployment is over 9 percent, is close to enacting a breathtaking cut in jobless benefits that would surely prove extremely harmful for unemployed workers — and very bad for the state’s economy.  The proposal would:

  • Slash regular state unemployment insurance (UI) benefits by nearly three-quarters. The proposal cuts the maximum benefit amount by a third, cuts the number of weeks of benefits from 26 to as few as 12 (depending on the unemployment rate), and cuts the number of workers who can receive benefits in the first place (such as by disqualifying workers who must leave their jobs to care for a disabled family member), among other cuts.

    Figures that the highly respected Upjohn Institute produced for the state estimate that the proposal would cut the total amount of UI benefits that jobless workers would receive in North Carolina — compared to what they are expected to receive under current law — by about 55 percent next year and by about 72 percent in 2021 (see graph).

  • Effectively bar long-term unemployed workers from receiving emergency federal benefits. The cut in state-funded benefits would make North Carolina’s jobless workers ineligible for extra weeks of emergency benefits, fully funded by the federal government, that the long-term unemployed in every other state can receive.  At a time when more than half of North Carolina’s jobless workers exhaust their regular state benefits before they are able to find work, this move is particularly cruel.  It also would hurt the state economy by turning away about $780 million in federal funds that otherwise would go to the unemployed, who would spend most of it in North Carolina.

Proponents of the cut rightly point out that North Carolina’s UI system, like many other states, faces serious financial problems.  Those problems, however, stem not only from the unusual depth and length of the recession but also from imprudent tax cuts.  In the 1990s, North Carolina cut UI taxes that businesses pay too low to sustain its system during a recession, a mistake from which the state has never recovered (see this graph).  Slashing benefits now would effectively force workers to pay for those ill-advised tax cuts.

The best approach to handling the financial strain that the recession has put on state UI systems is a patient and balanced one that includes phased-in tax increases and, when necessary, temporary benefit freezes or prudent cuts.  Colorado has enacted a sensible plan, for example.  North Carolina, on the other hand, appears headed in entirely the wrong direction.

Print Friendly

More About Michael Leachman

Michael Leachman

Michael Leachman joined the Center in July 2009. He is the Director of State Fiscal Research with the State Fiscal Project.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at CBPP.org

2 Comments Add Yours ↓

Comments are listed in reverse chronological order.

  1. 1

    Me and my grandkids will become homeless if they cut my federal benefits in July. I was laid off work for a company of 20 years and those benefits are the only thing from keeping food in my grandkids mouth or kicked on the streets

  2. MiMi #
    2

    I guess this cut will cause a DOMINO EFFECT throughout NC….time will tell.



Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact communications@cbpp.org.




× 6 = thirty six

 characters available