New GDP Numbers Show Historic Drop in State and Local Spending

January 27, 2012 at 5:11 pm

State and local government spending on goods and services fell at a faster rate — and hence had a bigger negative impact on economic growth — in 2011 than in any year in the last six decades,  Commerce Department data released today show (see graph).

When states and localities cut spending, they lay off employees (656,000 jobs lost since state and local employment peaked in August 2008), cancel contracts with vendors, eliminate or cut payments to businesses and nonprofits that provide services, and slash benefit payments to individuals.  In all of these circumstances, the companies and organizations that would have received government payments have less money to spend on salaries and supplies, and individuals who would have received salaries or benefits have less money to buy things.  This directly removes demand from the economy.

In 2011, Steepest Decline in State and Local Spending Since 1944

State and local governments have cut deeply their spending on schools and other public services for three straight years.  In fact, economic output from state and local governments fell by 2.3 percent in 2011 — marking the steepest drop since the wartime economy of 1944.  By reducing economic activity, these cuts have slowed the economic recovery.  (The tally includes state and local spending on education, transportation, public safety, and human services, among other areas.  It doesn’t include government benefits such as cash assistance and Medicaid, whose costs grew as the number of eligible beneficiaries rose after the recession hit.)

Three major factors contributed to the steep 2011 decline:  depressed revenues (which are still about 6 percent below pre-recession levels), the depletion of states’ reserve funds, and the end of emergency federal aid in June 2011.

Many states now writing their budgets for next year are again finding that they lack the revenue to pay for fundamental state services, despite the major cuts of previous years.  Unless states raise new revenue, the spending cuts will likely continue.

Print Friendly

More About Nicholas Johnson

Nicholas Johnson

Johnson serves as Vice President for State Fiscal Policy. You can follow him on twitter @NickCBPP.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at

1 Comments Add Yours ↓

Comments are listed in reverse chronological order.

  1. 1

    My own research has shown that state and local governments spend as much as $70 billion a year on subsidies to business. If they cut this rather than cutting programs, they could afford to rehire all 656,000 workers laid off since 2008. Considering that these subsidies rarely create new jobs from a national perspective, and worsen income inequality to boot, state and local governments would be much better off if they didn’t give them.

Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact

× 5 = forty

 characters available