Neither Territorial Taxation Nor a Corporate Tax Holiday Is a Good Idea

May 28, 2013 at 5:04 pm

A recent New York Times editorial about corporate tax avoidance panned two proposals — a “territorial” tax system and a tax repatriation holiday — that some U.S.-based multinational companies are backing.  We heartily agree with the Times’ assessment that these proposals could worsen an already flawed corporate tax structure.

A territorial tax system — under which a country generally taxes only the income that a corporation generates in that country, leaving other countries to tax the income generated elsewhere — would create greater tax incentives for multinationals to invest and move profits overseas rather than in the United States, as we’ve explained.  Even a “tough” territorial system with safeguards against inappropriate profit-shifting to low-tax countries would not fully prevent an exodus of investment and profits from the United States.  As a result, such a system would risk hurting domestic workers and businesses, boosting deficits over the long run, and weakening the economy.

A temporary tax holiday for “repatriated” foreign profits, which would allow multinationals to bring home their foreign profits and pay taxes on them at a much lower-than-usual tax rate, already failed spectacularly once (in 2004-2005).  As independent studies found, firms mostly used the profits not to invest and create jobs in the United States but instead for things like stock buybacks and larger dividends.  Some of the firms that repatriated the largest amounts then laid off thousands of U.S. workers.  And, as the Times pointed out, more than three-quarters of the profits that companies repatriated came from tax haven countries (see graph).

A second holiday would be worse.  Congress’ tax scorekeeper, the Joint Committee on Taxation, estimates that it would increase the deficit by tens of billions of dollars over ten years.  Worse, it would give multinationals an incentive to shift even more profits and investments overseas, in the hope that Congress would offer still another tax holiday at some point.  That’s why, when it enacted the first holiday, Congress said that it should be a one-time only deal.  It was a mistake that shouldn’t be repeated.

Print Friendly

More About Chye-Ching Huang

Chye-Ching Huang

Chye-Ching Huang is a tax policy analyst with the Center’s Federal Fiscal Policy Team, where she focuses on the fiscal and economic effects of federal tax policy. You can follow her on Twitter @dashching.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at

Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact

four × = 32

 characters available