More Key Players Understand Danger of Tax Reform Trap

October 22, 2012 at 3:50 pm

Two key policymakers on tax issues, Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Representative Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), made clear in weekend interviews that they understand the “tax reform trap” — the danger of locking in a much lower top tax rate as the first step in a process whose main goal must be to reduce deficits.  Such a move would be hugely expensive and regressive.

  • In an interview with the Washington Post’s Ezra Klein, Senator Schumer summed it up perfectly:  “If your number one goal is deficit reduction, you don’t start out by lowering the rates.  You don’t need a PhD in economics to understand that.”  He later warned:  “You can’t have it both ways.  You can’t get the top rate significantly lower and get deficit reduction without clobbering the middle class — and doing it at a time when middle-class incomes are declining.”
  • On C-SPAN, Rep. Van Hollen said that we should “allow the top rates to return to where they were during the Clinton Administration, when the economy was doing just great, and of course [this was] the last time that we balanced our budget.”  He pointed out that the bipartisan Simpson-Bowles deficit-reduction plan assumed, as its starting point, that the top rate would return to 39.6 percent and measured the deficit reduction of its tax reform proposals from that starting point.

He added:  “There are things we should do to simplify the tax code, but we should not arbitrarily pick rate reductions . . . and then say we’re going to try and find a way to try to pay for this.”

It’s encouraging to see that more and more policymakers understand that the goal of tax reform shouldn’t be yet another tax cut for people with the highest incomes.

Print Friendly

More About Chuck Marr

Chuck Marr

Chuck Marr is the Director of Federal Tax Policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at CBPP.org

Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact communications@cbpp.org.




7 − two =

 characters available