It’s Raining, So States Should Use Their Rainy Day Funds

July 29, 2011 at 2:54 pm

As our survey of states’ new 2012 budgets explains, many states are making unnecessarily harsh cuts this year in services like education and health care.  In five states — Louisiana, New Mexico, South Carolina, South Dakota, and Texas —  those cuts are particularly unwarranted because these states are sitting on substantial “rainy day” budget reserve funds, equaling at least 5 percent of last year’s spending (see graph).  The result?  More sweeping budget cuts that will weaken public services and slow economic growth.

Five States with large Shortfalls Left Substantial Rainy Day Funds Untapped

Take Texas, whose governor and lawmakers declined to draw on the state’s $6 billion in reserves to help offset its $18 billion shortfall for the coming two-year budget period.  Instead, they imposed draconian funding cuts on preschool and K-12 education, universities, health care, and other services.  They also deliberately provided less Medicaid funding than the program expects to need over the next two years, a gimmick that helped them “balance” the budget on paper but will force them to find new revenues or impose additional cuts later in the biennium.

Or take Louisiana, which opted not to use its hefty reserve fund — 8.3 percent of last year’s spending — to help close a budget shortfall that was nearly 20 percent of last year’s spending.  At the same time, for the third year in a row, Louisiana will fail to fund K-12 education at the minimum amount required to ensure adequate funding for at-risk and special needs students.  The state also is cutting support for child and family services by more than 30 percent, including services for neglected and abused children and victims of domestic violence.

Similarly, New Mexico, South Carolina, and South Dakota have significant reserves but didn’t use any of them to help balance their budgets.  Instead, they opted to rely on steep budget cuts in services that hurt the states’ neediest citizens.

Two other states — Iowa and Nebraska — also have reserves totaling at least 5 percent of last year’s spending.  Unlike the five states above, Iowa and Nebraska used some of their reserves to alleviate spending cuts, though even these two states left substantial rainy day funds on the table.

The dramatic drop in revenues stemming from the recession is just the sort of situation for which rainy day funds are intended.  States should make full use of them.

Print Friendly

More About Michael Leachman

Michael Leachman

Michael Leachman joined the Center in July 2009. He is the Director of State Fiscal Research with the State Fiscal Project.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at

1 Comments Add Yours ↓

Comments are listed in reverse chronological order.

  1. John Allen #

    Texas don’t have a fund. All of it is promised out. Its not spent but it has attachments that it is already spoken for. The mismanagement in this state will all come to light when Perry makes his bid to be President. I hope for all of us that never happens.

Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact

seven + = 16

 characters available