Is Government Spending Really 41 Percent of GDP?

October 18, 2011 at 4:38 pm

Chris Edwards from the Cato Institute generated some buzz recently by stating at a Joint Economic Committee hearing that government spending in the United States is 41 percent of gross domestic product (GDP).  Although that’s right — by one yardstick for one year — it exaggerates the situation.  Edwards used data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), which makes several adjustments to the U.S. data that pump up the government’s percentage from levels we’re used to seeing.  And Edwards picked a year when that figure is unusually high because of a weak economy.

Here’s what you need to know to put the numbers in context:

  • The OECD numbers reflect spending by all levels of government.  In the United States, that means federal, state, and local.  (State and local governments’ spending — not counting what they get from federal grants for things like Medicaid and highways — is about a third of the total.)
  • The OECD uses the United Nations’ System of National Accounts (SNA), which measures the government sector differently than we do in our national statistics.  Most importantly, the SNAs count as government spending the gross cost of many public services that users help pay for, like state universities and public hospitals.  (For example, the SNAs count the entire cost of running the public-university system, not just what legislators appropriate to supplement students’ tuition payments.)  Those adjustments push up the SNAs’ measure of both spending and receipts by roughly 4 percent of GDP compared with the standard  measure tallied by the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) in the U.S. National Income and Product Accounts (see figure).
  • Whether using the BEA or OECD measures, government spending jumped as a percent of GDP during the economic downturn.  That’s not surprising.  Automatic increases in safety-net programs like unemployment insurance and food stamps, plus recovery measures that Congress enacted, pushed up the numerator (spending), even as a slumping economy squeezed the denominator (GDP).  This happened in other countries, too.

U.S. Government Spends Less than Most Other Developed Countries

By the OECD’s measure, U.S. government spending topped 42 percent of GDP in 2009 and 2010 — when the economy hit bottom — and has slipped to 41 percent this year.   The OECD forecast, made before the Budget Control Act took a deep bite out of spending, has this figure dropping to 40 percent in 2012.   While the OECD forecast ends then, the Congressional Budget Office projects that federal spending will continue to decline through mid-decade as a percent of GDP.

Two other points are worth noting.  First, this doesn’t mean that government controls about 40 percent of the U.S. economy.  The bulk of government spending goes for payments to individuals through transfer programs such as Social Security, and most of the goods and services that people buy with these payments are privately produced.

Second, government spending in the United States — by the OECD’s broad measure—remains about 2 ½ percent of GDP below the OECD average, and about 8 percent below the average level among countries that have adopted the euro.  While the United States faces plenty of long-run fiscal challenges, out-of-control spending today isn’t one of them.

Print Friendly

More About Kathy Ruffing

Kathy Ruffing

Kathy Ruffing is a Senior Fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, specializing in federal budget issues.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at CBPP.org

3 Comments Add Yours ↓

Comments are listed in reverse chronological order.

  1. Ron #
    1

    When the government forcibly takes money from one citizen and hands it to others, I call it control. You can call it transfers, help, education or whatever. I still call it control.

    • Woody #
      2

      When the government transfers money to old people, sick and disabled people, poor folks, students, or even rich farmers or government contractors, it no longer CONTROLS the money. They can freely spend it.

      Paid propagandists in this country have spread the claim that government ‘control’ of people’s lives is somehow growing, but that is bogus.

      Wish I could get more money transferred to me, the way Blackwater or Halliburton or Lockheed Martin get it. I’d go out and spend the funds as fast as possible, and thereby enrich my fellow citizens!

      • toby #
        3

        So we spend less than other developed/wealthy nations, we also collect less in taxes so we have a big deficit. It seems the question for the nation is, what do we want to the gov’t to do? Do we need to spend 9 times more than the next largest spending country on military, what about our largest expenditures on medicare, medicaid, and social security? If we want all this stuff, I for one wish we would pay for it, rather than taking it on credit.



Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact communications@cbpp.org.




6 − = one

 characters available