Gini Index Confirms Rising Inequality Over Several Decades

September 13, 2012 at 5:15 pm

As my colleague Jared Bernstein has noted, yesterday’s Census Bureau report gives further evidence that inequality is worsening.  Yet the bureau’s discussion of one measure of inequality, the Gini index, could inadvertently make it sound as if this development was new in 2011.  It wasn’t.

Census says, “Based on the Gini index, income inequality increased by 1.6 percent between 2010 and 2011; this represents the first time the Gini index has shown an annual increase since 1993, the earliest year available for comparable measures of income inequality.”

We think that Census meant to say that this was the first statistically significant annual increase in the index since 1993.  Yet the trend has been inexorably upward, as the graph shows.

Under the Gini index, zero represents perfect income equality (all households have equal incomes) and 1 represents perfect inequality (one household has all the income).  The index has risen in almost every year since 1993, even if its rise in any one year failed to meet the test of statistical significance.

When it comes to inequality, the trend is clear.  The United States experienced strong economic growth and shared prosperity for the immediate post-World War II generation, followed by slower growth and growing inequality since the 1970s.  And our tax code and government benefit programs do less to offset inequality than many other countries’.

These facts help explain why we need to preserve and improve the safety net, and why we should raise taxes on people at the top as part of a balanced approach to deficit reduction.

Print Friendly

More About Kathy Ruffing

Kathy Ruffing

Kathy Ruffing is a Senior Fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, specializing in federal budget issues.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at CBPP.org

Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact communications@cbpp.org.




× seven = 14

 characters available