For New Governors, Getting Elected Was the Easy Part

November 3, 2010 at 10:14 am

Voters in more than half of the states elected new governors yesterday — the first time that’s happened since 1938, according to  But one thing hasn’t changed:  states still face massive revenue problems resulting from the recession.  Next year will be states’ worst budget year ever.  So what will the new governors do about it?

Many of the new governors promised in their campaigns to “cut spending,” but few specified cuts that would come anywhere near balancing their budgets.  Scott Walker in Wisconsin vowed to cut “policy and pork projects,” but he never indicated which programs he considers pork or whether they come anywhere near adding up to the $3.4 billion needed to balance next year’s budget.  South Dakota’s Dennis Daugaard, facing a 9 percent budget gap, said on his website, “I’m not afraid to make cuts,” but he did not say what those cuts might be.

The lack of specificity may reflect the fact that in most states, budget shortfalls are so large that a cuts-only approach would come at a big price for local school districts, public universities, and providers of health care and human services.  Those areas are where states spend most of their money, so deep spending cuts would hit those hard.

Cutting public services too deeply would also be bad for the economy.  States need good schools, roads, and health care in order to attract and retain businesses.

A number of the incoming governors made promises that, if they keep them, will worsen state finances.  For example, Wisconsin’s Walker, Michigan’s Rick Snyder, South Carolina’s Nikki Haley, and others have promised large corporate tax cuts, despite clear evidence that those tax cuts would deepen state budget problems without boosting the economy.  (My colleague Michael Mazerov will look at this issue later today in a separate post.)  Some other rookie governors have handcuffed themselves with no-new-taxes promises.

A reminder of what governors face:  state tax revenues remain 13 percent below pre-recession levels, and revenue growth in the coming year will be modest at best.  Meanwhile, demographics, inflation, and loss of family income are driving up states’ cost for services.

The result is the largest budget gaps on record, an estimated $140 billion for next fiscal year (which starts July 1 in most states).  States’ balanced-budget rules require them to close those gaps, and they’ll have to do so without emergency federal aid, since the funds Congress has already provided mostly expire this coming June.

Fortunately, a few of the newly elected governors have been explicit about some of the budget-balancing measures they will propose, including tax increases.  In Rhode Island, for example, Lincoln Chafee said he would broaden the sales tax base and might repeal a costly tax break for the wealthy.  Moreover, two sitting governors who raised taxes significantly to help close budget gaps — Deval Patrick in Massachusetts and Martin O’Malley in Maryland — defeated their anti-tax challengers.

Chafee recognizes what O’Malley and Patrick have already demonstrated:  solving states’ recession-driven budget gaps requires a balanced approach that includes revenue measures, not just spending cuts.   Other new governors would do well to acknowledge that reality — regardless of what they said on the campaign trail.

Print Friendly

More About Nicholas Johnson

Nicholas Johnson

Johnson serves as Vice President for State Fiscal Policy. You can follow him on twitter @NickCBPP.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at

2 Comments Add Yours ↓

Comments are listed in reverse chronological order.

  1. GAry V #

    Wisconsin’s Walker, in particular, has been very strident in making tax cuts and “ring fencing” a part of his campaign. He has promised to repeal “the day after I’m elected” in a “Jobs Session” of the legislature, the earlier $2-billion hike on wealthy and, enabling through combined reporting, on corporations. He has also promised to ring fence the Transportation Fund which had provided nearly $900-million in FY10-11 to the general fund; he has promised to exempt 20% of all Schedule K and Schedule C items from taxation $600 million; eliminate (“gradually”) the taxation of retirement income $1.5 billion, and just before the election announced that the corporate income tax should be eliminated as well, $1.9 billion. Since the structural deficit is estimated at $ 3.25 billion the June 2011 figure could well top $7.5 billion. This is an enormous amount for WIsconsin and will result in the elimination of state shared municipal revenues (tried by a previous GOP governor in 2000), a drastic cuts in Medicaid eligibility, and numerous other social services and education funding cuts. Much like at the national level, Walker has promised hands off to School Funding Aid (which is not heavily skewed to low-income districts), Corrections (now with a budget the size of the Univ. of Wisconsin System), law enforcement, and highway construction, leaving the cuts to come from 40% of the budget.

  2. James E #

    In many ways it is true that the states will face budget problems stemming from the recession, financial crisis and housing bubble (all combined effect) and many of the rookie governors have, in fact, handcuffed themselves to the campaign promises right from the start. Given the situation, I think most will “try” to avoid it by using the Federal government to make up the shortfall as Gov. Christie of NJ has done.

    I have seen this many times before, most notably in 2003, when the same but different candidates made promises to use the cut-the-spending only approach only to back off and raise taxes without compromising the states’ rating from the credit rating agencies.(I have the article from 2003 period that has chock full of people making that promise)

Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact

nine − 4 =

 characters available