Everything You Need to Know About the Budget Talks, in 11 Charts

November 5, 2013 at 3:51 pm

A House-Senate budget conference committee convened last week, and our new chartbook provides the context — what’s happened to deficits since the recession, why the weak economy should be part of the budget talks, what’s at stake for vulnerable Americans, how tax breaks can help reduce deficits, and how policymakers should evaluate deficit-reduction proposals.  Part I below shows that deficits have dropped considerably since the recession began:

Deficits grew significantly as a share of the economy (gross domestic product, or GDP) during the Great Recession for three reasons.  Federal spending rose because of “automatic stabilizer” programs such as unemployment insurance and SNAP, as well as temporary stimulus measures; tax revenues declined as individuals and businesses earned less; and GDP declined as the economy slowed.

Since 2010, deficits have been on a sharp downward path.  In 2013, the deficit fell to about 4 percent of GDP.  Assuming sequestration continues, by 2015 the deficit will fall to about 2 percent of GDP — less than the average of the four decades from 1969 to 2008 — and stay there through 2018.  (Even if sequestration were canceled and not replaced with alternative deficit reduction, deficits over this period would be less than 3 percent of GDP.)

After 2018, deficits as a share of GDP will begin to rise modestly, but they are projected to remain below 3 percent of GDP through 2021.  The aging of the population and rising health care costs will continue to place modest but consistent upward pressure on deficits and debt over subsequent decades, so longer-term deficit reduction remains important.  Over the next decade, the United States does not face a “debt crisis” that endangers the economy.

Click here for the chartbook.

Print Friendly

3 Comments Add Yours ↓

Comments are listed in reverse chronological order.

  1. Coco #

    http://www.offthechartsblog.org/ thanks for the great post and i am going to bookmark your blog for the latest updates

  2. 2

    The greatest concentration of 1%ers is around Washington DC. Government work is truly lucrative.

  3. Hugh Thompson #

    The chart in this article and many others on your website present CBPP “projections” for the next decade as fact. I would like to see CBPP’s projections of Deficits as a percentage of GDP which were produced in the 1995 to 2005 time period. Did these projections end up having any basis in reality? How can we so quickly forget that the vast majority of fiscal projections produced in the 1997 to 2004 time frame where pure fantasy predicting budget surpluses for decades to come.

Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact communications@cbpp.org.

six − = 5

 characters available