Claims About Economic Downside of Ending High-End Tax Cuts Don’t Hold Up

November 12, 2012 at 3:11 pm

House Ways and Means Republicans and others have cited a report — sponsored by various business interests and produced by the accounting firm Ernst & Young — claiming that letting the high-income Bush tax cuts expire would shrink employment by 0.5 percent over ten years, which the report says translates to 710,000 jobs “in today’s economy.”  Analysis by the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO), however, strongly suggests that this claim is highly implausible.  Here’s why:

  • CBO analyses indicate that letting the high-income tax cuts expire would very likely help long-term economic growth if policymakers use the resulting revenues to help shrink deficits, as the President has proposed. Letting the high-income tax cuts expire would reduce deficits by about $950 billion over the next ten years, thereby raising national saving.  That’s why CBO analyses indicate that letting those tax cuts expire likely would boost national investment and economic growth.
  • The Ernst & Young report vastly overstates how much more high-income people work as a result of the tax cuts and, in working more, contribute to economic growth. It estimates that tax cuts for high-income people would increase their work hours by about ten times as much as CBO estimates.  CBO’s figures are in line with empirical evidence showing that changes in tax rates don’t substantially affect high-income people’s decisions about how much to work.
  • The Ernst & Young report doesn’t even address the short-run impact of letting the high-income tax cuts expire — and a new CBO report shows that they are doing a poor job of supporting the recovery. The CBO report, which we blogged about last week, shows that extending the high-income tax cuts would boost GDP by merely 0.1 percent by the end of 2013.
Print Friendly

More About Chye-Ching Huang

Chye-Ching Huang

Chye-Ching Huang is a tax policy analyst with the Center’s Federal Fiscal Policy Team, where she focuses on the fiscal and economic effects of federal tax policy. You can follow her on Twitter @dashching.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at CBPP.org

Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact communications@cbpp.org.




× 1 = two

 characters available