Arkansas Shows Why Medicaid Expansion Is a Good Deal for States

July 20, 2012 at 3:03 pm

Critics who claim that their state can’t afford health reform’s Medicaid expansion should look at a new study from Arkansas’ Department of Human Services, which estimates that the expansion would produce more than $350 million in net savings for the state between 2014 and 2025 (see graph).

As we’ve explained, the Medicaid expansion is a good deal for states not just because the federal government will pick up the vast bulk of the costs, but also because expanding health coverage will save states money on health care for the uninsured.

Critics tend to focus on (and often exaggerate) the various costs that the expansion would impose on states while ignoring the various ways in which it would save states money.  Needless to say, you need to factor in both to understand the real impact on a state’s budget.

That’s what the Arkansas study does, and the results support what a task force convened by former New York Lieutenant Governor Richard Ravitch and former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker says in its new report on states’ long-term budget issues:  “For states that want to increase coverage for the uninsured, [health reform] is a bargain.”

Print Friendly

More About January Angeles

January Angeles

January Angeles is a Policy Analyst at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, focusing on Medicaid and state health policy issues.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at CBPP.org

Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact communications@cbpp.org.



 characters available