The Washington Post and CBPP’s Analysis on Stabilizing the Debt

January 28, 2013 at 3:32 pm

The lead editorial in yesterday’s Washington Post argues that it’s not enough to stabilize the debt as a share of the economy (i.e., gross domestic product or GDP) over the coming decade.  It says we should go farther and lower the debt-to-GDP ratio.

The debt target is certainly the subject of reasonable debate.  But, in making its point, the editorial may create a misimpression about a recent analysis by CBPP’s Richard Kogan which showed that, in the aftermath of the “fiscal cliff” budget deal, we need an additional $1.4 trillion in deficit reduction to stabilize the debt over the coming decade.  (We would need to do more deficit reduction for the decades that follow, which should become more feasible as we learn more about how to slow the growth of health care costs — the main driver of longer-term deficits — without reducing health care quality or impeding access to care.)

The Post suggests that the Center’s analysis is based on a rosy forecast because the forecast assumes steady economic growth and doesn’t assume the outbreak of new wars. But, there is no CBPP forecast reflected in our analysis; we simply used the Congressional Budget Office’s (CBO) economic and fiscal forecast — as such fiscal organizations as the Concord Coalition, the Bipartisan Policy Center, and the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, among others, do.  The Post might have informed its readers of that fact.

CBO assumes steady economic growth for much of the coming decade for a sound reason.  Rather than try to predict the years in which, over the coming decade, the economy will be stronger or weaker, CBO assumes economic growth rates over a decade that reflect average growth over the business cycle as a whole, including both recovery and recession years.  Its forecast isn’t rosy; it’s as likely to prove too pessimistic as too optimistic — just as CBO forecasts have proved over time.  (Moreover, by the Post’s logic, every CBO forecast since CBO’s creation in the mid-1970s has been a rosy one, because the forecasts assumed “steady economic growth.”)

Related Posts:

Print Friendly

More About Robert Greenstein

Robert Greenstein

Greenstein is the founder and President of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. You can follow him on Twitter @GreensteinCBPP.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at

1 Comments Add Yours ↓

Comments are listed in reverse chronological order.

  1. 1

    What if the $4.855 trillion of our Nation Debt which is Public Debt aka IOU’s that Congress has claimed they never intended to pay back was set aside to reduce the Debt under $12 trillion?

    Would that make a difference?

Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact

1 × two =

 characters available