10 Myths About the Estate Tax

November 5, 2012 at 3:46 pm

One of the lesser-known tax breaks that would expire at year-end under current law is a 2010 cut in the estate tax, which had already shrunk considerably between 2001 and 2009 due to President Bush’s 2001 tax cuts.  With policymakers expected to consider what to do about the tax in the coming weeks, we’ve updated a paper that corrects the 10 most common myths about it:

  • Myth 1:  The estate tax is best characterized as the “death tax.”
    Reality:  Everybody dies, but only the richest 2 in 1,000 estates pay any estate tax.

  • Myth 2:  The estate tax forces estates to turn over half of their assets to the government.
    Reality:  The few estates that pay any estate tax generally pay less than one-sixth of the value of the estate in tax.

  • Myth 3:  Weakening the estate tax wouldn’t significantly worsen the deficit because the tax doesn’t raise much revenue.
    Reality:  Extending the temporary estate tax cut enacted in 2010 rather than restoring the 2009 rules would add billions of dollars to deficits.

  • Myth 4:  The cost of complying with the estate tax nearly equals the amount of revenue the tax raises.
    Reality:  The costs of estate tax compliance are relatively modest and are consistent with the costs of complying with other taxes.

  • Myth 5:  Many small, family-owned farms and businesses must be liquidated to pay estate taxes.
    Reality:  Only a handful of small, family-owned farms and businesses owe any estate tax at all, and virtually none would have to be liquidated to pay the tax.

  • Myth 6:  The estate tax constitutes “double taxation” because it applies to assets that already have been taxed once as income.
    Reality:  Large estates consist to a large degree of “unrealized” capital gains that have never been taxed; the estate tax is the only means of taxing this income.

  • Myth 7:  If policymakers decide to retain the estate tax, the logical top rate would be 15 percent, the same as the capital gains rate.
    Reality:  To match the effective tax rate on capital gains, the top estate tax rate would need to be about 45 percent.

  • Myth 8:  Eliminating the estate tax would encourage people to save and thereby make more capital available for investment.
    Reality:  Eliminating the estate tax would not substantially affect private saving, and it would greatly increase government dissaving (i.e., deficits); as a result, it would more likely reduce the capital available for investment than increase it.

  • Myth 9:  The estate tax unfairly punishes success.
    Reality:  The estate tax affects only those most able to pay, and the funds it raises help support a range of programs that benefit the nation.

  • Myth 10:  The United States taxes estates more heavily than do other countries.
    Reality:  Measured as a share of the economy, U.S. estate tax revenues are below the international average for taxes on wealth.
  • Click here for the full report.

Print Friendly

More About Chye-Ching Huang

Chye-Ching Huang

Chye-Ching Huang is a tax policy analyst with the Center’s Federal Fiscal Policy Team, where she focuses on the fiscal and economic effects of federal tax policy. You can follow her on Twitter @dashching.

Full bio | Blog Archive | Research archive at CBPP.org

2 Comments Add Yours ↓

Comments are listed in reverse chronological order.

  1. Curtis P.... Heimberg #
    1

    Hi,
    It is extremely disturbing to see inflation called as Capital Gains, and therefore used as a reason to tax what has in the past been gains mostly due to that.
    When my estate was once in this category, of being taxed if I died, there was then and there still is no provision for indexing my estate to that, and it is wrong.
    A few of your so-called myths would indeed be so, if indexed to inflation and maybe local inflation, would now in fact be myths. Here is one for you, on inflation only, I paid roughly 50,000 in estate taxes, and the amount that came to me was less than 200,000 dollars. The other main beneficiary paid 800,000 in estate taxes on property his mom owned and was his principle sourse of income.
    Thus, from my situation, and my brother’s situation, your statements are false and any attempts to justify them, because inflation is not included, is false.

    …Curtis P…. Heimberg

    P. S. You are not the first person to say those things. I have no reason or power to demand, except honesty. Can you tell me, or anyone that some of your statements are not false, if inflation income is taxed the same as real income? Can you really without indexing all property to inflation, call it a Capital Gains? And if you cannot, why tax money made by anyone, that the taxes have already been paid on it.
    This issue was brought up, during Clinton’s administration, of not calling inflation, Capital Gains? He refused to do what was right here. Do you think that was right?

  2. Brent Waller #
    2

    Based on the myths of the estate tax as written by you, should there not be a sliding scale? Someone that works 40 years and every dollar taxed as personal income on the W2 and that estate exceeds $2 million, the government should get 55%? In fact, that would be double taxation. The country’s debt issue has never been a revenue issue (it’s always been 18 to 19% of GDP), it’s a spending issue. Please focus on spending, not taxation.



Your Comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation about important policy issues. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the CBPP and do not constitute official endorsement by CBPP. Please note that comments will be approved during the Center's business hours. If you have questions, please contact communications@cbpp.org.




+ 1 = two

 characters available